21
Aug 10

Update on my 2010 resolutions

Although I missed the midpoint of the year, I thought I’d post an update on my 2010 resolutions. This was the first time I’ve ever made any concrete goals for the year, and it’s true what they say – writing down your goals is one of the most important steps to making them a reality. Having had a blog post to go back and refer to throughout the year has helped me keep these goals in the limelight.

1. Expand my data tracker to include walking

Since 2009, I had been keeping a data tracker, as part of my interest in “the quantified self“. Each day, I’d input basic information such as my overall mood and hours of sleep, among others. I can forsee a day when a lot of this data will be automated or made a lot simpler to track than with an Excel spreadsheet, but that’s still somewhere off in the future.

While I did begin adding my daily steps to the data tracker, my results were unsurprisingly disappointing. This year, I’ve had a much more hermit-like lifestyle than in the past, doing my schooling and sidework at home and purposely not going out very often (partially to save money, partially to stay focused). Thus, my walking score was quite often shockingly low – so low that it was pointless to keep tracking it.

After a bout of depression and a major life upheaval in the spring, I decided to stop my data tracking hobby. While it would’ve been fun perhaps in a decade to look back on the quantified trends in my life, it was simply too much work to collect and analyze. I suppose I’ll wait until new automated hardware arrives on the shelves.

2. Get a part time job

This has been tricky. In fact, I’ve been trying to get a job on and off for the past four years. 2010 I’ve had more concerted efforts, overhauling my resume to remove any potential reasons for employers to discriminate during the hiring process (aka: gay community work!), as well as sitting down for hours and applying over and over on those ridiculous online application forms. If companies insist on using an online system, they really ought to agree on a simple standard for all businesses to use so we can remove the onus of repeated data entry for applicants. It is truly a massive waste of time.

Anyways, the demand in the job market certainly is not like it was a couple years ago. I’ve heard difficulties from friends in finding a simple service job as well, so I’ll amount my current troubles to a lack of jobs and a high supply of potential hires. Confronted with such poor prospects, I’ve had to slash my socializing budget, and have instead delved headfirst into school.

3. Exercise at least once a week

This I’ve done on and off. There’s no recreation centre in my community (well, it’s now under construction), and I’m not the type to try and make bus connections for a 15 minute ride to the closest location, and then pay for a pass to exercise for an hour. It’s all too expensive and too much hassle.

In terms of exercise, I don’t need any tremendous amount of cardio, though building my aerobic capacity is always a good thing as a former asthmatic. I tend to focus on building muscle mass, and have done circuits at home, usually twice a week. Though I should try to remain on a weekly schedule, and focus on creating a protein-rich diet for consumption following the routine, I’m satisfied with my current efforts.

I would like to pick up cycling, kayaking, or skiing with time, as I prefer activity-based exercise to a boring gym. Unfortunately, with summer nearly over, there’s little point in investing in a new bike now. I don’t have a vehicle, so kayaking and skiing are pretty much off the radar until that problem is solved. But hey, once the job market picks up, who knows.

In any case, this is tiding my health over until the new rec centre opens next year, which I’ll totally use as it’s only a 5 min bike ride/10 minute walk away.

4. Less procrastination, better time management

With little spending money, I’ve been staying home way more than in the past, which has forced me to procrastinate far less. This focus has translated into the completion of roughly one university course every two weeks, an intense but achievable, and highly satisfying, process. It had reduced the amount of time I used to spend thinking about the City, the Region, and transit matters, which has reduced the amount of blog posts here.

That said, it is amazing how much time is spent and arguably lost hanging out with people or in commutes. Depending on one’s goals, these can be huge time sucks with little return. My life goal at this point in time is to catch up on university and fast-track my first year, which I’ve been successful at so far. I’m not looking to build new friendships or start new relationships – that will come next year perhaps. And I’m okay with that.

This goal, I’m proud to say, has very much been achieved.

5. Do less better

For the past couple years, I’ve been very impulsive, jumping on opportunities whenever they opened up. While I’ve created a broad network of connections and gained a more holistic perspective on life, it has meant that I became a “jack of all trades, master of none.” I didn’t have much focus in life – there was too many projects without enough completion. Furthermore, as altruistic as my projects may have been, they won’t be paying the bills anytime soon, a reality with which I’ve had to contend with.

Learning to focus on that which is most important, learning to establish priorities and stick with them, I’ve gained so much in terms of managing my time and my energy. I’ve had to reduce my commitments and my projects, but in turn, those which I’ve decided I can do have become more successful than if I had remained all over the place.

It is still difficult at times to remain focused and to turn down opportunities, but I’m learning and overall I am doing less better.

6. Broaden my horizons to a global view

At the beginning of this year, I theorized that the failure of some of my projects in the past had to do with a small pool of people who had the same values or beliefs as myself. For example, when I tried to organize a local candlelight vigil for the Copenhagen negotiations in December, part of a global day for climate action, the response was quite disappointing. With just 20 people showing up, I was heartbroken. Ultimately, it had to do with the pool of people I was drawing from. Surrey lacks community and is poorly organized in that fashion, at least in comparison to Vancouver. This is one case where, had I drawn from, let’s say, all of Canada, theoretically there’d be a greater pool of people interested in participating, and thus the event would’ve been more successful.

Part of this goal had to do with returning to my online roots. Drawing from a global pool of people, it is a lot easier to find your community or your niche. It would be difficult to organize and hang out with, say, Harry Potter fans in Vancouver region, whereas on the web, there’s a number of great fan sites that facilitate that connection.

Having operated somewhat unsucessfully at a local level for a couple years, I wanted to go back to the web to find myself and return to my communities. What I’ve learned though is the value of face to face interaction and local community. While it may be difficult to establish, it is just as valuable as the online communities. I think deep down that I am a local boy – I think of myself as a Surrey resident, a Metro Vancouverite, and a British Columbian. While I may also associate with Canada and the globe as essential parts of my identity, their scales are simply too large for me to operate in. I value return on investment and that is most visible when you are in a small community, either in an online niche, or at a local, regional, or provincial scale.

So, this goal I think was another impulsive reaction on my part. I’ve always maintained a glocal perspective (think global, act local) on life and I will continue to do so in the future.

7. Stick to a proper sleep schedule

I’ve never been the type of remain on a sleep schedule. Every weekend, I would sleep in till 10 or 11am. There are those who will wake up every morning at the same time, no matter when they go to bed – I’m not one of them. I used to get around 10 hours sleep a day, though recently have discovered I actually operate more productively on about 7. Any more and I’ll be on oversleep mode, wandering through the world in a zombie-like state for the whole day.

Perhaps it’s because my teen years are now behind me, but I am more prone to naturally going to bed earlier than in the past. I’ve always been a night owl, but as a teen I would stay up till 1, or 2, or even 3 sometimes. Nowadays, I get tired around 11:30 and go to bed usually no later than 1. Which I’ve found is a good thing – I like waking up when the sun is still out; it feels like there’s more to the day that way.

Altogether, I haven’t yet gotten a concrete sleep schedule, partially because doing school online provides me with the flexibility to wake up whenever I feel like it. However, I am satisfied with the progress I’ve made on this goal and don’t think I’ll ever be the type to go to bed at 11 and wake up at 6 everyday – I like rolling with the punches of each day.

8. Launch a web project in partnership with a developer

Now this is an interesting goal. For many years, I’d had a range of online/tech-based projects and ideas I thought would be brilliant but simply didn’t have the skills to code them on my own. I made a goal to finally work with someone to launch one, and in that regard, I have been semi-successful.

In the spring, I had this brilliant blog concept that I was quite confident in. I hired a designer to work with me, ensuring the product had a professional look to it prior to launch. That was an interesting process itself, finding the right partner to work with, developing a brand online through email and Skype, and keeping it all within a tight budget.

That process has been complete for some time. Since the spring however, I’ve begun my university classes, and due to the tight timeline I set for myself, haven’t had the spare capacity to focus on building the blog as I initially wanted to. In the Fall, my university course completion time will extend from a two-week to four-week frame, giving me more time to focus back on the blog idea. So, look for that in the fall sometime.

9. Write a book

Few of you know this about me, but the first topic that got me engaged in “changing the world” was education. My issues with the school system early on translated into creative solutions and new approaches to education, and essentially what became a whole new school system that I developed when I was 16. Since then, I’ve become side-tracked, first with regional transit issues, then with queer community capacity building. I intend in time to return to education, and am taking university classes on the topic this fall. At this point, I plan to use my degree to become a teacher, which will hopefully give me another perspective on the system, allowing me to tweak and modify my old plans.

Through the years though, I’ve returned time and again to this fundamental problem of the education system. I strongly believe that solving this issue could be the greatest gift I could give to the world. If we solve education by allowing each and every individual to build their unique skills, capacities, and identities with the goal of them becoming strong leaders in their community, then we’ll have a pool of human resources from which we can solve the other great problems in the world, from climate change and famine, to poverty and the global economy. Without that strong foundation though, we’re never going to fix these other issues.

I’ve long contemplating the best platform from which to unveil my concepts, and have yet to figure out the best one. I do have a dream of one day sharing my framework for education at TED, but that’s a ways off. My idea at the beginning of 2010 was to share my ideas in a book. Obviously, it wouldn’t be published, but it would be at least a first draft from which I could later mold and remold as my idea develops.

With regards to this goal, I’ve made no progress. I don’t feel too bad about it though – I think when the time’s right, my ideas will find their platform. Right now, I still have much more to learn about education before I claim to have the perfect solution to its problems.

10. Get my driver’s licence

This I did! In February, four years after turning 16. I’ve become quite good at driving automatic, and am finally beginning to get the hang of standard without stalling. Props to me for this.


17
Jun 10

Down memory lane: Chretien and Romanow saved ’82 Constitution

I’ve been doing some research lately into Canadian politics in the Trudeau and Mulroney eras in preparation for a history course. While rummaging through the CBC Digital Archives (fantastic resource btw), I found two very interesting clips, especially considering the recent discussions around Liberal-NDP cooperation.

The first, I found particularly shocking. Chretien has always been known as a mastermind politician and is fondly remembered as the three-peat PM of modern Canada, but did you know he was an MP for decades before receiving the top job? He was among Trudeau’s right-hand men, and in the clip below, shows how pivotal he was to the passing of the 1982 Constitution Act and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The talks in 1981 were Trudeau’s third attempt to patriate the Constitution. Apparently, on the eve of the final night, Trudeau was confident that the talks would fail once again, and told Chretien that much. In the wee hours of the morning, then Justice Minister Chretien quickly worked with then Saskatchewan Attorney General Roy Romanow and then Ontario Attorney General Roy McMurtry to make a deal. The so-called “Kitchen Accord” devised that night led to an agreement the following morning among nine provinces – an agreement which formed the basis of the Constitution and Charter.

This willingness to cooperate and compromise between Chretien and Romanow should not be overlooked. The fact that they alone saved the talks and gave us the Constitution is a testament to their collective power. This is interesting indeed considering rumours that they are the ones leading the discussions for Liberal-NDP cooperation.

YouTube Preview Image

The second clip is from the 1968 Leader’s Debates; the first televised in fact. The debate consisted of four leaders: the Liberal’s Trudeau, the Progressive Conservatives’ Robert Stanfield, the NDP’s Tommy Douglas, and the Ralliement créditiste’s (Quebec Social Credit party) Réal Caouette. They are asked a question about the validity and effect of so many federal parties and of the instability of minority governments. In this clip below, the famed Tommy Douglas predicts that someday in the future, the right and left in Canada will consolidate back into two main parties. Could Douglas have very well supported a Liberal-NDP merger, especially in light of the success of the “unite the right” movement of the 90′s?

YouTube Preview Image

09
Jun 10

Here comes the tolling backlash

It was reported today that if drivers cross the new Port Mann Bridge without a transponder, the toll rate will rise from the previously announced “around $3″ pricetag to $5.15 – one way. Apparently, the increase is a result of a “video-processing” fee to cover the cost of the elaborate overhead licence plate scanning system that will capture the information of all vehicles crossing the River. It’s not a particularly surprising move by the provincial goverment and is in fact a great incentive to encourage drivers to buy or rent a transponder, which will speeds things up for everyone. The 2009 Golden Ears Bridge has a similar system of flexible payment options with variable tolling rates. That said, there’s two elements to this story that I find rather interesting.

The first is the little detail hidden in the CBC’s coverage that states tolls will increase 2.5% each year. As far as I can recall, this has never been mentioned before and will catch a lot of people off guard. A toll is a tough pill to swallow as it is, and although the annual rate increase is minimal (it will take 13 years to go up by a dollar), if reported widely enough, it will be seen as another tax grab at the expense of the working class.

Secondly, I’m delighted to see how outraged people seem to be at the toll! I’ve long held the belief that Metro Vancouverites, when finally confronted with the monthly tolling bill, will balk at the expense and claim the sky is falling. We British Columbians like being drama queens. Although, truth be told, $3 one-way is a significant burden to bear. For a daily commuter between Surrey and Coqutilam (of which there are many I might add), they will be paying an extra $120 a month to get to work. This is on top of the perceived high insurance rates, high gas tax, carbon tax, expensive gas prices, and an undesirable commute.

I couldn’t find the direct quote, but when Kevin Falcon was Minister of Transportation, he once said something to the effect that commuters would gladly pay the toll in exchange for a smooth, traffic free drive. It is a simple proposition of opportunity costs. You either pay through delays and traffic or you pay through your wallet. Falcon bet that people’s time was worth paying for.

And I’m sure for many it is. There are most definitely people out there that have the money to pay their way out of inconveniences. These are the same people that hire Molly Maids to clean their houses or take taxis around downtown instead of walking. There’s nothing wrong with that. I just happen to believe that the majority of people, who are used to paying through congestion, are not going to take a toll lightly.

Commuters have adapted for years to traffic. It’s what humans do best – adapt to our circumstances. Maybe that means leaving home an extra 15 minutes to beat the traffic; maybe it means carpooling with another co-worker to hit the HOV lane; maybe it means hopping onto transit to avoid the gridlock.

Back in the mid 2000′s, commuters were fed up with the lineups along the Port Mann and were delighted to hear that, toll or not, the government was finally going to address one of their biggest needs and ease the bridge congestion. Taxpayers in the Valley were emotionally ecstatic, not taking the time to logically think about the tradeoffs. $3 billion dollars was being spent to speed up a 10-20 minute delay. It was going to be charging tolls both ways. There was no money being invested in viable transit alternatives in the meantime. For those who took pause, it was easy to see that this was not the panacea people assumed it to be.

For some, it will take the bridge’s completion and their first drive across for the reality to hit. For many others, it will come when the first bill arrives in the mail. Then I suspect people take a moment to reflect and have second thoughts about the entire project.

Just look at the Golden Ears Bridge. Long been planned by the region to meet projected demands, and pushed forward by former Surrey Mayor and TransLink Chair Doug McCallum, we spent $800 million on this crossing. Early statistics are showing demand is not meeting the projections, and TransLink is now trying to figure out ways to encourage more people to drive! Meanwhile, the Canada Line is bursting at the seams due to unwise contractual obligations and funding schemes inherent in the poorly worded public-private partnership signed with operator ProTransBC.

Could it be that we are more ready than we think to adopt rapid transit and ditch our cars? Could we be tired of the escalating costs, in both time and money, of the daily commute? Are we too locked into a pattern of inertia to ask ourselves these questions before we spend billions of dollars on megaprojects?

In December 2012, the new Port Mann Bridge will open and the tolls will begin. While its hard to comment on whether or not driving rates will increase, remain steady, or decrease, I do think that major cultural changes will reverberate through Metro Vancouver. I suspect that people will quickly become frustrated at the toll and will seek alternative forms of transport. I suspect that communities north and south of the Fraser will densify and become more self-sufficient as a market response to the increased costs of crossing the river. I suspect that commuters will not opt to take the rickety old Pattullo bridge as their untolled option. I suspect Valley taxpayers will demand regional tolling equity, forcing the government and TransLink to devise a new tolling policy. I suspect people will lament the boring cable-stayed design, the likes of which will make all the bridges along the Fraser look the same.

But of course, nobody can predict the future. If the early response is any indication though, it seems as though Falcon may have made the wrong bet.


08
Jun 10

The Liberal Democrats: it’s doable, so let’s do it

YouTube Preview Image

Compromise and cooperation: two words heard far too rarely from the House of Commons.

In 2008, spurred on by a literal financial death sentence by the Conservatives, the Liberals and the NDP, supported by the Bloc Québecois and the Greens, quickly mobilized to form a progressive alternative government to the Tories. Their working plan for Parliament emphasized strategic economic stimulus in the form of investments in infrastructure, social services, education, and green energy. Yet, within the course of one week, thanks to the brilliant spinning of the Conservative war room, Canadians soon equated the word “coalition” with “the socialists and the separatists”. Parties and MPs working together to accomplish the goals of the majority of Canadians died.

And yet, here again, an opportunity has resurfaced. The circumstances are just as political as before. The Liberals, even despite dumping the leader they never quite supported, are now polling at numbers even lower than when Mr. Dion was at the helm! Realizing that the downward spiral of the Liberal party may very well be a long term trend, influential members from its left-wing faction are mobilizing their supporters to push a coalition, or even a possible merger, with the NDP.

And why not? Regardless of the self-concerning reasons driving this new backroom push, all progressive Canadians should be supportive of this effort. We represent 60% of the population, yet do not retain anywhere close to a majority within Parliament. This is due, in part, to the lack of a proportional voting system, but also a result of having four left wing parties splitting the vote.

The right once had similar problems. Brian Mulroney’s wide alliance of regional conservative factions in Canada began to splinter following the failure of the Charlottetown and Meech Lake Accords. Quebec nationalists who had supported the Progressive Conservatives in an attempt to gain major concessions in Quebec’s designed entry into the Constitution suffered a major blow when Meech Lake died. Meanwhile, westerners were increasingly fed up with the federal government’s wooing of Quebec, feeling their demands and needs were being neglected in return. The Quebecers, now more riled than ever to separate from Canada, formed the Bloc Québecois. The westerners, led by Preston Manning, formed the Reform Party under the tagline, “The West Wants In”.

In the election of 1993, suffering from the split of their party, as well as significant backlash from the economic recession and the newly introduced GST, the Progressive Conservatives, now led by a recently-installed Kim Campbell, was reduced from 211 to 2 seats in the House of Commons. The party never recovered.

In the following elections of 1997 and 2000, the right suffered from the splitting of their vote. It has been argued that the Liberals gained their support base of Ontario due to the vote splitting between the Progressive Conservatives and the Alliance (formerly Reform) – the province typically voted Conservative in provincial elections. When Stephen Harper won the leadership of the Alliance, he quickly moved to unite the right, and in 2003 the Conservative Party of Canada was formed.

The new alliance between blue tories from the Alliance (social and economic conservatives) and red tories from the PCs (social progressives and economic conservatives) was, and remains, tense. Many former PCs moved to the Liberals, contributing in part to that party’s shift to the right. Harper’s a magnificent tactician and this explains why he runs his party primarily from the centre-right, but every now and again implements or proposes some radically right-wing policy, such as the abortion exemption from third world maternal healthcare initiatives, to appease his former Alliance faction.

The Liberals are also a party of factions, going right back to their historic roots as a joint effort between the reformers of Lower and Upper Canada. This alliance between French and English Canada is the primary source of conflict within the Liberals. It has been remarked that there is a political hot potato between leaders emerging from either Toronto or Montreal. Pearson – Trudeau – Turner – Chretien – Martin – Dion – Ignatieff; it goes back and forth. If you look at the historic trends, it seems as if the Liberals succeeded the most when led by a Quebecer and failed the most when led by a Toronto elitist.

From the perspective of a British Columbian, the inherent elitism of the Toronto faction is quite apparent. I once attended a couple Liberal events and they were filled primarily by old white men, the kind I imagine rule the backrooms of the party in Ontario. Toronto has a historic reputation for being the centre of the universe, a sentiment well replicated within the Liberal party. The Toronto elitists are hard-headed, full of pride and resentment, arrogant to the max, and believe quite ardently that the Liberals are the natural governing party of Canada. They are the ones who have pushed for neo-liberal economic policies of the 90′s, for better or for worse.

Meanwhile, the Quebec faction is culturally quite different. I think it stems from the historic identity of Quebecers. Quebec, as the colony of New France, was never a significant economic or political force. It was one of the smallest settlements in the New World and relied heavily on support and trade with the First Nations. Quickly, colonial ideals fell by the wayside and years of mere subsistence led to greater integration with the Aboriginals. The coureurs de bois who lived among the First Nations would eventually lead to the Métis people. Once Quebec was taken over by Britain, it remained a small, neglected cultural enclave surrounded by the increasing influence and of Upper Canada. Quebecers were never one to tout amongst their neighbours or to seek significant riches, and were willing to work with others to ensure the continuation of their unique way of life.

Currently, the forces of the Liberal party that are initiating these discussions with the NDP are from the Quebec faction. Compromise and cooperation to retain their identity and ideals – sounds right up their alley eh? The major opponents are the Toronto elites, proclaiming a betrayal to the history of the party.

To that I would argue that one needs to put one’s country before one’s party. I understand that there are many vested interests in both parties and with any change, some will win while others will lose. Right now though, it’s Canada that’s losing. We have suffered six years of inaction and setbacks thanks to Harper’s Conservatives.

Where’s the progress on climate change? Where’s the progress on a national housing strategy or a national transit strategy? Where’s the progress on universal child care or the future sustainability of our healthcare and pension systems? What about post-secondary education, green energy, or the arts and culture sector? What about the ongoing inequities of Aboriginals, both on and off-reserve? What about trade expansion with the growing BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India, and China – or Mexico or South Africa?

Harper has been coasting off the record of progress from previous administrations. With a renewed sense of ourselves and our place in the world following the Vancouver 2010 Olympics, I believe Canadians are ready and poised to take an even greater leadership position on the world stage. We have great success stories to share with the world, but we cannot become complacent. There are far too many ongoing national issues to confront before we start proclaiming Canada to be the “Best Place on Earth”. We’ve going something good going here, but there’s still much work to be done – work that will only be undertaken by a progressive federal government.

Perhaps it’s because I’m still relatively young and optimistic that I believe politicians should work together to achieve common goals. When over 40% of the population doesn’t vote in an election, I think it’s a tell tale sign that the status quo isn’t working out too well. I know many people from my generation that believe that by working collaboratively we can change the world for the better. The lack of this philosophy being reflected in our federal political system could very well explain the disinterest young Canadians feel towards Parliament. A bold, renewed left is just what the doctor ordered to cure this malaise.

Progressives in Canada have a unique opportunity in front of them, the type of which only comes around once in a blue, or reddish orange, moon. We have a chance for progressives, regardless of historical affiliations or personal partiality, to work together to regain an element of influence over the course of this country’s future. By working in unison, rather than in competition, Stephen Harper will no longer be able to pit us against one another and continue his slow transformation of Canada and its place in the world. Will there be disagreements along the way? Of course there will, but at every disagreement, there’s also a chance for compromise and debate. Consensus may not always be built, but in doing so, we fabricate a better understanding of the challenges facing us and the solutions that are on the table.

This is a chance to make history. Let us seize it. Bring on the Green Liberal Democrats!


10
May 10

$2.50 bridge tolls would raise $450M each year

Late last year, when TransLink’s imminent budget collapse was making headlines, I decided to do some research on alternate forms of revenue. Road and bridge tolls have long been suggested as a means of raising new funds, while also disincentivising driving. Nobody however seemed to know how much money would actually be raised through tolls. Determined to find out that number, I crunched some data, and put together the report available below, Moving Forward Together – a regional tolling strategy for Metro Vancouver.

The result? If all of the major bridges in Metro Vancouver had a $2.50 toll, $450 million in new revenue would be raised annually – oddly enough, the same financial gap that TransLink needs to fill to continue with its aggressive expansion strategy. In the report, I calculated how much revenue would be raised over the course of five years, with the toll increasing $0.50 annually. I chose this strategy because 50 cent tolls won’t have a major impact on citizens’ budgets, and raising them over time will provide a transitional era whereby drivers have the realistic option to switch to alternatives, like transit, as they are provided/improved. Altogether, a $2.50 is still cheaper than the proposed $3 toll for the new Port Mann, and the $4 currently placed on unregistered vehicles crossing the Golden Ears Bridge.

The data was retrieved from annual crossings numbers provided by the Ministry of Transportation. They did not, however, have data for all the bridges, only the Alex Fraser, Massey Tunnel, Lions Gate, Oak St, Port Mann, and Second Narrows. Missing bridges from their data, and thus the final numbers in this report, include the Pattullo, Pitt River, Golden Ears, Knight St, Queensborough, and the Burrard Peninsula and Sea Island crossings.

Furthermore, as this is not in anyway a comprehensive, scientific analysis, my numbers do not factor in any impact the tolls will have in terms of diverting people out of their cars, and thus reducing crossings and revenues. Surely, there would be a percentage of people who will transition from their cars or begin carpooling, if tolls were introduced on all major crossings. That said, I suspect, if a “transitional” strategy like the one I proposed was implemented, with minimal tolls in place at least initially, there would not be a huge drop in bridge crossings, as the toll would still be affordable and reasonable to most. Translation? There wouldn’t be a mass exodus from cars, thereby dropping the revenue numbers. Instead, it would hopefully happen over a decade or so, as tolls are slowly increased to the point where only those who need to drive do so, and everyone else takes a reliable, convenient alternative.

I should also note the other reason I decided to research this issue. At the moment, with tolls on the Golden Ears, tolls coming to the Port Mann, and tolls proposed on the Pattullo, there is a significant question of regional equity in terms of tolling, with the South Fraser region bearing the entire monetary brunt so far. This is not at all fair. One possible solution is balancing out the proverbial tolled load across the region. Instead of $4 tolls on one bridge, $1 tolls across the region would raise the same revenue and discourage people from flooding the untolled bridges to escape the fees.

Overall, I found the results intriguing to say the least. No matter what, tolls will be part of the transportation future of this region. The question is, when are we going to finally begin having an adult conversation about it?

I think we should begin right now.

Moving Forward Together: A regional tolling strategy for Metro Vancouver