South of Fraser residents don’t want SkyTrain!

I was going through the South of Fraser Area Transit Plan today, and I was reminded that, given the choice of what rapid transit services they wanted, almost all residents South of the Fraser turned down SkyTrain.

According to the document, TransLink reps gave residents colour coded lengths of tapes to place over a regional map as part of a visioning process. The length of this tape was based on a reasonable estimate of the budget TransLink would have for expansion.

  • 1 piece of SkyTrain = 5 pieces of BRT
  • 1 piece of LRT = 3 pieces of BRT
  • 1 piece of BRT = 1.5 pieces of Frequent Bus services

Now, let’s examine the outcome of this visioning process.

SkyTrain

There was very little agreement for this expenditure, primarily because of the cost and the limited penetration into the South of Fraser that results by spending all available capital on this type of rail. Most participants started out with SkyTrain but then began to understand the tradeoff between service single corridors versus creating a network of services.

LRT

There was more agreement on this investment with a number of corridors being highlighted. However, overall, the network remains thin because rail takes up the majority of the budget. Most participants picked out corridors shown in previous transit strategies such as King George highway and 104th Street in Surrey of Fraser Highway from Surrey to Langley. The Southern Rail (Interurban) corridor was highlighted in Workshop but it did not appear in the other 24 maps. Interestingly, there was limited support for the northern section of the line.

BRT

The network and the level of agreement for Bus Rapid Transit echoes the market research. It is interesting to note that as the budget is spread among les expensive alternatives, the network that can be created increases both in scale and popularity. Respondents seemed to understand the concept of the B-Line as Bus Rapid Transit and were interested in extending a similar network throughout the region, including to Abbotsford.


————————————————————————————-

Now, take the above into the context of almost a year or two ago, before the Provincial government decided to invest $4 billion into our transit system.

With this change, I think it’s safe to say that we have a slightly larger budget now. When taking this into account, I think choosing to develop at least one of the major transit corridors in the SoF region as LRT would be a smart move. There are numerous advantages to choosing rail over bus, despite what some would tell you.

Furthermore, TransLink has a terrible reputation for stalling upgrades or expansions years after they were necessary. Obviously, the B-Lines have been a success. However, if you don’t meet initial success with quick expansion, typically through providing more buses, the whole experience diminishes in quality and convenience quite rapidly. Just try riding either the 98 or 99 B-Line and you’ll quickly find out that they pale in comparison in terms of definition as “rapid transit” beside our SkyTrain system. The routes get stuck in traffic, the bus doesn’t have much of a premium interior, and you can never get over the simple fact of overcrowding.

I think the SoF area has a prime opportunity here to convince Mr. Falcon to redirect the money in place for SkyTrain expansion in Surrey to provide us with at least one LRT route – and heck, throw the rest of the millions into more buses for our future BRT routes – so we can avoid having to stand for 45 minutes on the Fraser Hwy.

3 thoughts on “South of Fraser residents don’t want SkyTrain!

  1. Yes!! Those are really interesting graphics.

    Several months ago my bf told me Langley didn’t want SkyTrain out there. At the time I thought, why not? It would be such a good thing! Well given what I know now… they weren’t saying they didn’t want rapid transit, period.

    I’m sure we’ll talk about this more in a couple days and I’ll pick your brain about Gateway. :P

  2. BUS RAPID TRANSIT is useless unless the buses run on segregated lanes separated from other traffic, and also have the ability to do ‘signal prioritization’, ie: bus drivers can flip a switch to make the lights change as they approach intersections. Unless these two conditions are met, IT IS NOT REAL BRT!! B-lines do not have this and so they shouldnt even be called BRT. They are giving BRT a bad name!!

  3. Pingback: Surrey - The New Urban Core « metro babel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Note: This post is over 3 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.